<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 27</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamiemalanowski.com/blogwp/27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamiemalanowski.com/blogwp/27/</link>
	<description>Jamie Malanowski's official web log</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:52:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://jamiemalanowski.com/blogwp/27/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamiemalanowski.com/blogwp/?p=2914#comment-72</guid>
		<description>The money is really a two-edged sword. And as we all saw between 2001 and 2008, a large payroll is no guarantee of playoff success. The Yankees had long been a free-spending team, but throughout the eighties, this brought them no success at all. But in February 2001, the team signed Derek Jeter to a ten year, $189 million contract. That set the big ticket model in stone, because the only way the team could insure that such a huge contract would make sense would be by surrounding Jeter with the best players available. This approach seems to offer opportunities, but it also creates problems. The team ended up acquiring uni-dimentional sluggers like Jason Giambi, overpriced middle relievers, and declining pitchers like Randy Johnson. One of the biggest contributions to the 2009 title came in 2008, when GM Brian Cashman allowed the big contracts of Abreu, Mussina and Giambi to expire all at once, giving him the financial latitude he needed to acquire three stars who were in their prime. But there are also signs Cashman is aiming to change the model, most prominently when he refused to give up a lot of young and inexpensive talent for Johann Santana.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The money is really a two-edged sword. And as we all saw between 2001 and 2008, a large payroll is no guarantee of playoff success. The Yankees had long been a free-spending team, but throughout the eighties, this brought them no success at all. But in February 2001, the team signed Derek Jeter to a ten year, $189 million contract. That set the big ticket model in stone, because the only way the team could insure that such a huge contract would make sense would be by surrounding Jeter with the best players available. This approach seems to offer opportunities, but it also creates problems. The team ended up acquiring uni-dimentional sluggers like Jason Giambi, overpriced middle relievers, and declining pitchers like Randy Johnson. One of the biggest contributions to the 2009 title came in 2008, when GM Brian Cashman allowed the big contracts of Abreu, Mussina and Giambi to expire all at once, giving him the financial latitude he needed to acquire three stars who were in their prime. But there are also signs Cashman is aiming to change the model, most prominently when he refused to give up a lot of young and inexpensive talent for Johann Santana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Yates</title>
		<link>http://jamiemalanowski.com/blogwp/27/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Yates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamiemalanowski.com/blogwp/?p=2914#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I thought the line from Weekend Update was pretty good. Not quoting exactly, but something like, &quot;The economy seems to be rebounding, especially here in New York where spending has increased. Two examples are the Yankees, and Michael Bloomberg, who both recently bought victories for themselves.&quot;

The Yankees are a great team, but they have to be. They are essentially the all-stars. Just about any All-Star free agent out there gets signed by the Yankees.

It was a fun series anyway, as always it was bittersweet because now we have the long, dark, cold period with nothing to mark the days from one another until we hear magical phrases like, &quot;Pitchers and catchers report...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the line from Weekend Update was pretty good. Not quoting exactly, but something like, &#8220;The economy seems to be rebounding, especially here in New York where spending has increased. Two examples are the Yankees, and Michael Bloomberg, who both recently bought victories for themselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Yankees are a great team, but they have to be. They are essentially the all-stars. Just about any All-Star free agent out there gets signed by the Yankees.</p>
<p>It was a fun series anyway, as always it was bittersweet because now we have the long, dark, cold period with nothing to mark the days from one another until we hear magical phrases like, &#8220;Pitchers and catchers report&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
